Bath – Still a Pedestrian Unfriendly City.

Over twenty years ago, in those glorious days when the Chronicle was still a daily paper and had a variety of articles from freelance writers such as Bob Jennings and – dare I say it – myself, I wrote an article about a subject that was dear to my heart. I called it Bath, the Pedestrian Unfriendly City.

I have to declare an interest. I tended to walk or catch the bus when visiting town, even though I had the use of a car. It seemed easier to do so, than fiddle about looking for parking spaces, even before the council started charging for on street parking. Indeed, until fairly recently when a number of health problems have reduced my walks to strolls, I was also a keen walker in the countryside, and have completed a number of long distance footpaths. One of these, the Cotswold Way, begins (or ends) in Bath.

I long felt that the best way to see Bath was on foot, and I was happy to lead guided tours around the city. One of the chief complaints I heard about Bath from visitors was its lack of pedestrianised areas and its air quality. There is hardly a city in France that does not have a zone piétonne. These are often attractively laid out with fountains, open air cafés, but in many cases, light commercial vehicles and cars have the right to come through after business hours. Air quality in French cities therefore is much better than here.

People also moaned like mad at having to wait so long at controlled crossings, and when the lights changed, you needed to be fairly nippy to get across before the lights changed back. At first there were no lights in Queen Square, just a traffic island, but the situation for pedestrians is now actually worse. You have to wait for ages and then you have about five or six seconds – count them – before the lights change back. Before, you could cross in two stages, and the traffic went slower because car drivers had to be more cautious too. Now, at the first gleam of a green light, it’s foot down and go!

Even worse is the situation at George Street. This is a well-used crossing, and has always had a longish wait but recently it’s been made even longer. I don’t know what council officer or councillor thought this was a good idea, but the result is that even more walkers get impatient and dodge through the cars. If there’s an accident there, then Bath and North East Somerset Council will be culpable for having made this lunatic decision.

When I wrote the article, some places had no crossings at all. Some still don’t. At North Parade, there were no pedestrian lights. You had to take your life in your hands to cross Pierrepont Street or North Parade Road at the corner. Even crazier, there were no pedestrian crossings at Churchill Bridge, so anyone using the Avon Walkway, joining at Widcombe, had to cross four lanes of traffic to reach the continuation along by Green Park.

So I put forward many of my complaints and remedies into the article and sent it off. A week or so after it was printed, I was contacted by the council. There was going to be a conference on pedestrians in Bath and would I like to attend. I asked if this was as a result of my article. No, it was not, I was told very firmly – it had long been planned. A few days later I was called by someone else to check if I was coming. This time I was crafty. I innocently pointed out that it was at very short notice. ‘Yes,’ said the person on the other end of the line, ‘but some woman wrote an article for the Chronicle about Bath being pedestrian unfriendly.  It’s thrown the department into a panic and they felt it had to be dealt with.’

Intrigued, I went along. There were several presentations, but it soon became apparent that the council did not want to listen to what pedestrians had to say. I think most people were horrified to find that the council planned walking routes. Now the whole joy of walking a city is that it is anarchic. You can walk where you like. You can take a short cut or explore little alleyways. You can cross the road where you will. That, it seems was to be challenged. There would be walking routes in the same way there are cycle routes.

It did not take long for there to be uproar. There was a brave attempt by the organisers to limit questions and we were definitely not supposed to be critical. One officer lost his temper in the middle of questions, saying he had not come here to be challenged on his plans. He was presenting them and that’s how it was going to be. He then seized his notes and stormed off.

There was a real arrogance about what was happening, and this was manifested in the attitude of the officer for disabled access, who informed us that only wheelchair users – and he was one – understood the problem. This was deeply unfortunate, as in my view wheelchair access is still far below par – notably at the station – but he soon put the backs up of many in the audience. Like others there, I had a member of the family who was by then using a wheelchair, so I had pushed it around the city and knew the difficulties. Moreover, it was while I was chairman of the Mayor’s Guides that two guides set out to identify the issues faced by wheelchairs users and the lack of dropped kerbs. This study resulted in improved access. So to be told I was ignorant of the problem was frankly insulting, and I was not alone in being upset. This attitude of the council that it always knows best and its failure to communicate with those affected has also resulted in problems for the visually handicapped. A change of texture in paving at crossings, with pimpled stones, is an excellent idea but no one asked the visually handicapped about the size of the pimples. The council has opted for large ones, and one registered blind person said she regularly stubs her toes on them.

Eventually the meeting, which I realise was well-intentioned, broke up in bad-tempered disarray.  However, I was called in to see a councillor about crossings, and this did result in crossings at North Parade and –after a very long wait – crossings at Churchill Bridge.

Now, with the increase in cycling, matters have got worse again for pedestrians. This is sad, because cyclists and pedestrians should unite in battling the internal combustion engine lobby. It is not the fault of cyclists. They have got themselves organised, with articulate spokesmen, but the council’s efforts to placate them has resulted in conflict and occasionally a muddle for both cyclists and pedestrians.  Take the crossing from Westgate Street to Kingsmead Square. No one has any idea about who has priority. I thought that in 20 mph zones pedestrians had priority – and if they don’t, they should have. In Vancouver, pedestrians have complete priority. Stop at the kerbside and the traffic screeches to halt to allow you to cross.

I was finally provoked into writing this update on Pedestrian Unfriendly Bath because, on Twitter, a well-known cycling campaigner in Bath, with whom, as far as his campaign for cleaner air in Bath goes, I  am in complete agreement, said that cyclists were the bottom of the heap. I said they were not – pedestrians were. He was livid and told me to take it back – that it was not worthy of me.

I will not take it back. It’s true. He said we don’t have to battle with HGVs. I beg to differ. Living, as I do, near the Warminster Road, I am always worried that one will drive up over the pavement as I’m walking along. Skid marks in the grass and on the pavement show that this is a not infrequent occurrence. We have to cross roads in places where the council has ignored the possibility that people will wish to cross, so we do battle with cars, HGVs, white van man and – yes – cyclists. One black spot is Westgate Street.  With its narrow pavements and the refusal of the council to limit loading times, this is a nightmare for pedestrians and cyclists. Now, the HGVs have destroyed the kerb so often so the council has decided just to tarmac the kerb edge. This is dangerous – it’s so easy for someone to slip off the edge.

It’s as though pedestrians don’t matter. Where work is going on at the Abbey, the hoarding has made it very narrow by the stops for university and open top buses. First Bus and Bath Open Top Buses are not allowed to move their bus stops from there, though the open top bus people have done their best. Only B&NES can sanction this, but in a twitter discussion I had over this, @bathnes remained determinedly silent. At busy times, when there are queues at the stops, passers-by are left with no option but to step into the road, especially people with pushchairs. I doubt if there is room for a wheelchair at all.

The irony is that we are all pedestrians at some time or another. I firmly believe that if you get a city right for pedestrians, it will soon improve for cyclists and ultimately for everyone. I am unhappy with the notion that Bath Christmas Market – which I think is beginning to be past its sell-by date anyway – should now spread up Milsom Street, but at least it would prove that Milsom Street could be pedestrianised. We could have a car-free central spine running from Southgate to the top of Milson Street. Wouldn’t that be wonderful?

I would make waiting time for those at crossings shorter, and would introduce more crossings, such as at the bottom of Gay Street. These could just be zebra crossings – as could the ones all round Sydney Gardens. Queen Square has had the side openings to the central garden restored – but try reaching them if you’re on foot, through the lanes of rushing traffic. The Square was never meant to be a roundabout. Let’s reroute the traffic to restore it to being a quiet restful place.

I would introduce restricted loading times. Other cities do this – again French cities nearly all do this, as do many parts of London, so why not in Bath? Give pedestrians priority in 20mph zones – where this happens it has been shown it slows traffic down and reduces speeding offences. Again,  if Vancouver can do it as a matter of course, we can here.

Planning should clamp down on the fad among architects for shallow steps instead of a slope liek those at Brunel Square and Sawclose. Not only is this a real handicap for wheelchair users, they are downright hazardous for the visually handicapped. It’s often hard to see them if you have normal eyesight. They are an unnecessary nuisance, and may well contravene the disabled access acts.

I know the cyclists feel put upon, and I agree that in many places, especially on London Road, they have had a rough deal. But, dear cyclists, don’t start treating us pedestrians like the enemy. And don’t forget, at least a car coming up behind someone walking makes a noise. Cyclists are silent, so if you’re behind someone on foot, they don’t know you’re there if you don’t ring your bell. If you’re campaigning for better conditons for cyclists, stop and think how it will affect those on foot. It may not be the benefit you think it is. Most walkers very much preferred the canal towpath before the cycle-friendly surface was put on it. However, it has improved it for  wheelchair users so, by and large, it’s a plus.

In the show Oklahoma, there’s a song, The Farmer and the Cowboy should be friends.  The cyclist and pedestrian should be friends. Let’s work together towards a better solution, and towards defeating the mad petrol-heads who see any attempt to improve life for other road users as an attack on their personal liberty and who appear to have the council under their thumb.  Sadly, Bath remains seriously unfriendly towards pedestrians. The sooner someone in Bath and North East Somerset Council starts listening to us, the better.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Bath – Still a Pedestrian Unfriendly City.

Hidden Histories

Our first four history talks at Chapter One Pub in Bath were so successful, we’re doing four more! This time it’s Bath’s HIDDEN HISTORIES. Whether you enjoyed the first ones, or missed them and want to join in now, we’ll be delighted to welcome you. And don’t forget – you will be able to lay the dust of the past with some of the excellent beer, cider or other drinks on sale, and learn more about the other activities at the pub.

After these four, we’ll be taking a summer break, but plan to return with a new autumn/winter series.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Hidden Histories

History Talks at Chapter One.


Michael and Emma Heap at Chapter One Pub on the London Road – once upon a time the Hanover Hotel – have now extended their opening hours to Wednesday evenings as well. So co-founder of Akeman Press, Kirsten Elliott, is offering four history talks on four Wednesdays – 14th and 28th of February, 14th and 28th March. Called A Step to the Bath, the talks will examine what it would have been like to visit Bath during its Georgian heyday.

The first one is about the state of roads and dangers of travel. Not for nothing did people make their wills before setting out on a journey. Floods, mud, and highwaymen were just three of the perils of a trip to Bath.

The second is about finding lodgings, why inns were not hotels, how lodgings worked, and some of the trials and tribulations, from delinquent servants to noisy neighbours.

The third is about the various entertainments and social life. Everything from riding schools to balls will be covered, not to mention gambling – both licit and illicit. And of course, the varied delights of the pleasure gardnes will feature.

The last talk deals with the dangerous side of Bath – crime, including duels (and why Nash banned them), prostitution, street crime etc.

The price doesn’t include drinks but there will be handouts. If you want to book in advance, it’s £20 for all 4, £5.50 for individual booked talks, and £6 on the door.Either email Kirsten or book at the pub. The tlaks will last an hour – thenyou’re free to enjoy some of the amazing range of drinks at the bar!

We look forward to welcoming you to Chapter One.

Michael and Emma – the welcoming landlords of Chapter One Pub

Chapter One is on the corner of London Road and Hanover Street, nearly opposite Morrison’s. There’s a bus stop right outside.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on History Talks at Chapter One.

Country Walks from Bath – an eco-friendly book.

Andrew Swift is well known for his regular walk articles in both the Bath and Bristol Magazines. With the agreement of the editor of the Bath Magazine he had previously worked up some of his walks around the city into a handy walkers’ guide to the less well known parts of Bath, entitled On Foot in Bath.

Now Andrew takes people out further into the surrounding area with his latest book Country Walks from Bath. There is, however, an added twist to the book, which takes advantage of Bath’s proximity to open countryside. At a time when people are being encouraged to cut down on car use, these walks, like those in his previous book, all start in the city centre. However, he thoughtfully includes public transport routes in case you want to avoid the walk through busy streets.

The fourteen walks vary in length from 3½ miles to 17 miles, but many of the longer walks have options which mean you can create your own, shorter walks and still use the book. It also contains a wealth of good advice, such as where you can find lunch stops, which maps to take, and what to do if approached by lively cows.

Andrew has a lively and entertaining style – informative without veering between the extremes of being pompously didactic or patronisingly simple – but there is a serious aim to the book. The inspiration behind it is to offer readers a chance to reconnect with what, for many 18th century visitors, was the city’s main attraction. As Andrew says in the introduction ‘Walking in the countryside around Bath has an illustrious tradition. It not only formed part of the city’s much-vaunted health cure, but also enabled visitors to commune with the ideal of rural bliss extolled by the writers and artists who moulded 18th century taste.’

Even where the walks are on quite well known routes, there is so much information that the walker may well discover new points of interest. Indeed, the book is also a good read in its own right, with articles on subjects as diverse as Twerton Round Hill, the mysterious stones on Claverton Down and the forgotten landscape of Charmy Down. Those who know Andrew Swift as a rail historian will not be surprised to find three walks exploring the area where the Titfield Thunderbolt was filmed, as well as articles on inclined planes and the railway planned for the Woolley Valley. Nor does he avoid controversy – there is a thought-provoking piece about the Battle of the Bypass, the proposal for the Eastern Park and Ride, and the revival of the A36 to A46 link road.

One of the mysterious standing stones on Claverton Down

By contrast, these are modern ruins on Charmy Down











Camerton New Batch deep in the Somerset coalfield.

All but two of the walks are circular – the exceptions take you to Bradford on Avon, from where you can return by train, and out to Corsham (by way of Farleigh Down and Box) from where there is a regular bus service.

The mysterious Weavern Farm between Box and Corsham

The book is copiously illustrated with archive pictures, many from the Akeman Press Archive, but also with Andrew’s own, sometimes quirky, photographs. This is a book by turns informative, funny, instructive, and, occasionally, angry. Even for those who just like a gentle stroll it is a good read – for keen walkers in the area, it is an absolute must. And just to prove how eco-friendly it is, it’s printed on sustainably resourced paper.

A view to enjoy on a winter’s walk in Bath’s countryside.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Country Walks from Bath – an eco-friendly book.

A Mystery Photograph from 1909

Around 20 years ago, an old photograph album came our way. Many of the photos it contained showed two young men on holiday in Bath in 1909. They were keen golfers and around half a dozen of the shots showed them playing golf on Lansdown. The photographs of where they stayed were even more interesting. They called it ‘our bungalow’, but it was in fact an old railway carriage. Shots entitled ‘view from bungalow’ appear to show Brockham End, and one caption noted that the Bristol Channel could be seen 11 miles off.

Among the places they visited and photographed were Royal Victoria Park, Hedgemead Park, Pulteney Bridge and the canal at Widcombe. They also ventured to Clifton, Wells, Cheddar and Dundas Aqueduct. One photograph, though, featured a location we were unable to identify. It showed a small cottage with another building at the back, and, to the side of it, a ruinous wall with a large blocked-up window that looked fairly ancient. The caption only added to the mystery. It simply read: ‘Bath – When one cottage falls down, they build another at side & — move.’

Having looked at this photograph from time to time over the years, and failed to get any closer to hazarding a guess as to where it might it be, I thought the chances were that it would forever remain a mystery. Now, though, we think we might have come up with an answer.

Reading through the Summer 2017 Newsletter of the Ancient Monuments Society, I was interested to see an entry for Hinton Priory near Bath. A geophysical survey of the correrie or lower house, which was some way from the main priory buildings, in an area known today as the Friary, had revealed ‘the presence of important below-ground archaeological remains.’ As this is a spot we knew well, having walked past it on numerous occasions, I checked the revised entry on the Historic England website ( and decided to go and have another look at the site.

Although, as indicated in the report, most of what had been discovered was below ground, the report also drew attention to a building known as Woodman’s Cottage (ST788591):

‘A field investigation carried out in 1995 (RCHME) suggested that one of the cottages at the site, Woodman’s Cottage, incorporates some C14 masonry, though it is unclear whether these fragments have been re-used. The Hinton Abbey Estate map of 1785 depicts a large building with an L-shaped footprint in this location indicating that Woodman’s Cottage represents the surviving eastern part of a larger building. It retains a fireplace with four-centred arched surround of C17 date, and it is likely that the building was constructed at this time but using some earlier fabric … Further dressed stone is evident in the gardens of Woodman’s Cottage and River House (Whistler’s Hollow on the current Ordnance Survey map) to the north-west. Groundwork in advance of the construction of an extension to the east gable end of Woodman’s Cottage in the early C21 uncovered a section of walling some 3m wide which may relate to the larger building shown in this location on the 1785 estate map.

Given the importance of Woodman’s Cottage, which we had hitherto been unaware of, we naturally paid it more attention than we had paid it before, and it was while heading across to it that it struck me that this could possibly be our mystery building. When we got home and looked through the album again, however, the building in the photograph looked nothing like it. The setting, however, looked right, and there was something about it that suggested that, despite many changes, it was the right building. Another visit seemed to confirm this. The cottage had been extended, the ruinous wall either been taken down or reconstructed to form one of the walls of a new building, while a building shown at the back in the photograph – and whose existence was confirmed by an OS map from the 1880s – had been demolished. For the moment, though, the identification of this as our mystery building remains tentative, until such time as those familiar with the building have had chance to take a look at it. But, if it is correct, it might just provide another piece of the jigsaw that makes up the history of the extraordinary building.

If our identification of this as Woodman’s Cottage is correct, the scene has changed dramatically since this photograph was taken in 1909. The cottage has been extended to the left, the building in the background has gone, and the wall with the blocked-up window is now the site of an outhouse or garage, which may incorporate part of the wall.

A close-up of the cottage

A close-up of the wall with blocked-up window

An OS map from the 1880s. Woodman’s Cottage is at the bottom, to the left of the word Friary. The layout of the buildings, including a now-demolished outhouse behind the cottage, corresponds with the buildings in the photograph from 1909.


Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on A Mystery Photograph from 1909

Buddy Holly in Salisbury

It has just been announced that a blue plaque is to be unveiled on the old Salisbury Gaumont where Buddy Holly and the Crickets played in 1958. There is, however, another iconic building in the city associated with his legendary visit to the city, which featured in a book we published in 2010 – The Inns of Wiltshire. Among the inns featured was the George, a Grade I listed building which has seen even more changes than the Gaumont since 1958.

The George was open by 1364, when the Teynturer family owned it. William Teynturer was a member of the Guild of St George, which probably accounts for the inn’s name. In 1623, the council decreed that the George was the only place in Salisbury where plays could be staged, ‘the size and form of the inner courtyard being well adapted for that purpose’.
Shakespeare and Cromwell are both reputed to have stayed at the inn. In June 1668, Samuel Pepys ‘lay in a silke bed’ there and had ‘very good diet’. When he ‘paid the reckoning’, however, he found it ‘so exorbitant, and particular in rate of my horses, and 7s. 6d. for bread and beer’, he ‘was mad, and [resolved] to trouble the mistress about it’. The George also features in HG Wells’ Secret Places of the Heart, in which he alludes to ‘the mediaeval modernity of the Old George smoking-room’. His reverie is interrupted, however, by an American visitor who instructs him to ‘just look at that old beam! … To think it was exactly where it is before there was a Cabot in America!’
It was to this ancient hostelry that Buddy Holly came with the Crickets on 22 March 1958. At the Gaumont that night, he was backed by the Tanner Sisters, Gary Miller, Ronnie Keene & his Orchestra, and Des O’Connor. In a letter written from the George to his parents back in Texas, he confided that ‘everyone comments on how my jokes get bigger laughs than the comedian on the show, Des O’Connor,’ before telling them what a ‘real old, quaint place’ the George was. Less than twelve months later, he died in a plane crash at the age of 22.
Less than ten years later, in 1967, the ground floor of the George was removed and a steel frame inserted to support the upper floors, creating an arcade into the ‘Old George Mall Shopping Centre’. Over 40 years later, even in a city so rich in historic buildings, the enormity of the devastation still seems incredible.

After the ‘conversion’, a restaurant opened upstairs in the old inn for a while, but this closed in the 1990s. Since then, most of the building has remained disused, empty and, except for occasional guided tours, closed to the public. The wonder is that, despite the destruction of the ground floor, the building should have retained its Grade I listed status. This can only serve to underline the importance of what remains, and of the urgent need to reverse decades of neglect.

Adapted from The Inns of Wiltshire published by Akeman Press, 2010



Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Buddy Holly in Salisbury

Four New Ghost Signs in Six Months

Since publishing Ghost Signs of Bath late last year, four more ghost signs have been uncovered in Bath. The most impressive is in Oldfield Park, which appeared when the old party shop was refurbished to become Fire & Brew, which serves pizzas alongside local craft beer and cider. This sign almost made it into the book, as we were alerted to its discovery as the book was going to press. However, once a tiny bit of it had been revealed, it was decided to hold off revealing the rest until a plan of action to safeguard it could be worked out. So, as we could not hold up publication, we reluctantly had to leave it out. Now that it is revealed, the care and attention lavished on it can be seen to have been well worthwhile. This is a splendid sign, painted on glass and dating from the early 20th century, It has a curious feature, however, which we did not spot straight away, but, once you have clocked it, is obvious. This store started out as a branch of the Twerton Co-Operative Society, which, after a merger in 1922, became part of the Bath Co-operative Society – so the sign had to be changed.  Instead of replacing the whole thing, the section with ‘Twerton’ on it was removed and replaced by one reading ‘Bath’ – which has three less letters, and, as can be seen, did not take up the same amount of space. The style of lettering is also slightly different … so not only a great sign, but one with a bit of history that is not immediately apparent.

The next sign turned up on Lansdown Road, just below the old Old Farmhouse pub, on the corner of Ainslie’s Belvedere. This is a particularly well-preserved old butcher’s shopfront, dating from the days before refrigeration, when the windows could be opened fully, and hooks for meat hung from the awnings designed to keep deflect sunlight. Around 1919, it was taken over by Fred Cornish,who had his name – FT Cornish – painted below the window on the side. In the 1950s he was succeeded by WT Cornish (presumably his son) who altered the sign to read WT Cornish – and this is what it still reads today, although if you look carefully you can see the ghost of the F beneath the W.

Next to emerge was a sign for GJ Davis at 45 Bradford Road, Combe Down – not a particularly old sign, as he was there in the 1950s, but still a pleasing reminder of a lost age.

The most recent to appear is a good deal older. Sometime before 1910, W&J Warren opened a fish and fruit merchant’s at 7 London Street. They had gone by 1914, but the sign – admittedly not that easy to make out, and with traces of other writing as well – has now resurfaced over a century later. Whether it is covered up again remains to be seen.

That makes a total of four signs in six months … and word has reached of another possible sign on Bear Flat, which I’ve yet to check out. The story of Bath’s ghost signs is one that clearly is not going to stand still.


Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Four New Ghost Signs in Six Months

The View from Little Solsbury

The ramparts on Little Solsbury date from the Iron Age, and the land within them was occupied as a camp or hillfort from around 300BC to 100BC. Alone among the hills surrounding Bath, it commands views in every direction, a distinction it shares with Kelston Round Hill, three and a half miles to the west. The views from here, though, over the valleys converging on Bath and its hot springs, are perhaps even more spectacular. The origins of its name are unclear, although it is thought that it may have derived from Sulis, the deity worshipped at those springs.

It takes a leap of the imagination, though, to comprehend what the view from Little Solsbury was like before the modern age, with its roads and urban sprawl, when the only sounds would have been those of the wind, of sheep cropping the turf and of skylarks high above. Or of what it would have been like, when the camp was occupied, looking out over the valley robed in moonlight. Or on moonless nights, when the darkness would have been broken only by the pinprick, flickering gleams of fires in hilltop camps ringing the horizon, and the only sounds would have been those of the birds and animals of the night, the hunters and the hunted.

Beyond that, history shelves off into myth. Little Solsbury is one of the candidates for the site of the Battle of Mons Badonicus or Mount Badon, at which Romano-British forces – possibly led by King Arthur – repelled an Anglo-Saxon advance in the late 5th or early 6th century. Writing in 1791, the Rev John Collinson also recorded the legend that Bladud built a temple dedicated to Apollo on the hill. More prosaically, he also revealed that, in his day, the land within its ramparts was an ‘arable field’ yielding ‘fine crops of barley’.

Little Solsbury’s current fame was assured when Peter Gabriel released ‘Solsbury Hill’ in 1977, describing a mystical moment when ‘time stood still’ as he climbed the hill. Ironically, this is one of Jeremy Clarkson’s Desert Island Discs – ironically because it was the Conservative government’s road-building programme that propelled Little Solsbury to national attention. The question of whether King Arthur fought the Saxons here may be a matter of conjecture; there was nothing illusory about the battle fought on Little Solsbury in 1994.

This was the first of the great anti-road building protests of the 1990s. Spurred into action by the imminent destruction of a sacred landscape little changed for millennia, the group of activists who took to the trees in the path of the diggers in March 1994 soon had a groundswell of local and national feeling behind them. In mid-May a weekend of action saw 1,200 people march on Little Solsbury.

The response of the authorities was draconian, with police and security forces using brute force to clear the campaigners out of their way, a tactic which backfired spectacularly. Many of the confrontations were captured by photographer Adrian Arbib. When the photographs were published, showing the campaigners responding with dignity to intimidation and violence, it was plain for all to see that the campaigners, far from being the feckless rabble the authorities portrayed them as, were idealists fighting for a cause – and a cause, moreover, with which a growing number of people were in sympathy. These were individuals undergoing hardship, abuse and provocation not for personal gain, but to try to save the environment and preserve a nationally important heritage site for future generations. The photographs also revealed the lengths to which those intimidating them were prepared to go. (The photographs can be viewed at, which includes much more about the campaign.)

Ultimately, the battle was lost and the road was built, but the campaigners, by raising awareness of the implications of the government’s road building programme, successfully derailed around 300 other schemes. One lasting reminder of the campaign is the mizmaze cut in the turf below the ramparts of Little Solsbury by the campaigners. It commands a view up the Swanswick valley, with the caterpillar of trees at Freezing Hill on the horizon, a view now blighted by the dual carriageway slicing through it. Having been maintained and recut over the years, most recently in 2016, the mizmaze is still in remarkably good shape.

Today, surveying the scene from the ramparts of Little Solsbury, the legacy of the government’s intransigence is only too apparent, with the incessant roar of traffic mounting to a crescendo as you head down the slopes. Almost a quarter of a century on, a similar intransigence has raised its head, as councillors press ahead with plans to build a Park & Ride car park on the meadows through which the dual carriageway runs. Opponents of the scheme, along with many independent experts, believe it will have little or no impact on Bath’s traffic problems, but will be a hugely expensive and environmentally devastating white elephant. There have already been demonstrations larger than any Bath has seen for years; should the work begin these will undoubtedly escalate. The inheritors of the spirit of 1994 – and no doubt some of the original campaigners – will not let the wanton destruction of heritage and environment go unchallenged.

The Park & Ride is only part of a wider threat to the countryside east of Bath, however. The Batheaston by-pass was originally planned as a link in a superhighway linking Southampton to the M4. With plans to extend it shelved, Bath was left, in George Monbiot’s words, with ‘a high-spec dual carriageway to nowhere’ (Guardian, 11 February 2009) In that article, Monbiot went on to say that ‘building our way out of congestion and pollution is now a discredited idea, and for this the campaigners of Solsbury Hill can claim some responsibility’.

Despite this, proposals to link the bypass up with the A36 by building a road east of Bathampton have rumbled on for years, and Bath’s Conservative MP, Ben Howlett, has lobbied tirelessly for it to be built. Although only short, it would have a massive impact, and not only on the immediate area. Linking the A46 and the A36 would effectively make two narrow, winding and inherently unstable roads on the sides of steep valleys part of a major trunk route. Although the A46 and A36 are currently used as a through route by HGVs and other vehicles, many drivers are deterred from using this route because they either have to drive through Bath or, if their vehicle is small enough, use the single-carriageway and frequently congested tollbridge at Batheaston. Promoting increased usage of roads little changed for two centuries or more, and falling far short of the standards a new road would have to meet, seems a supreme act of folly. The A36, in particular, is so prone to slippage and subsidence that it has had to be closed for lengthy periods in recent years to shore it up, work that, by the nature of the terrain it runs through, can never provide a long-term solution.

But this link road is what Howlett and his ilk propose as the panacea for Bath’s traffic woes. Never mind about looking for sustainable solutions, never mind about investing in a viable public transport infrastructure. Rip up what is left of the countryside, encourage more people to get into their cars, to drive along roads manifestly unfit for the purpose, to park in Park & Rides … pave over paradise in the name of unsustainable economic growth.

Eight years on, George Monbiot’s belief that building our way out of congestion and pollution was a discredited idea seems to have been over-optimistic. With climate-change deniers taking charge and notions of progress ditched in favour of a headlong dash into the least creditable aspects of our past, it seems increasingly the case that, the worse an option is, the more chance there is of it being adopted. And, when George Monbiot returned to the subject of the bypass protest in May 2017 to address the current state of the nation, he made no bones about the enormity of the challenges ahead:

‘I remember being struck by the thought – when lying with a group of dreadlocked anarchists at the foot of an iron age hill fort in 1994, in the path of an earth mover commissioned by John Major’s government – that we were the conservatives and they were the destructives. We were seeking to defend the fabric of the nation while they, with their road schemes joining the dots between scheduled ancient monuments, chalk downlands, water meadows and woodlands, were trying to pulp it. They claimed to be patriots, but we loved this country more than they did … I find it hard to see how anyone can love people without also loving the living world that gave rise to us, or can love our civilisation without loving what remains of those that came before.’ (Guardian, 3 May 2017; the full article is at:

The battle lines are drawn; only history will tell whether the fight to save this precious part of our inheritance will be more bitter than any Little Solsbury has yet witnessed. For the sake of future generations, though, we can only hope that it succeeds.

(An edited extract from Andrew Swift’s forthcoming book, Country Walks from Bath)

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on The View from Little Solsbury